<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: a Pseudo-HDR image</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ExquisiteLines.com/ExquisiteLines/a-pseudo-hdr-image/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ExquisiteLines.com/ExquisiteLines/a-pseudo-hdr-image/</link>
	<description>Providing artistically beautiful and finely crafted images of the most precious moments of your life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 May 2014 04:27:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>https://ExquisiteLines.com/ExquisiteLines/a-pseudo-hdr-image/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exquisitelines.com/?p=299#comment-5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the tip. I&#039;ll check it out. Kind of in that stage right now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip. I&#8217;ll check it out. Kind of in that stage right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clamroll</title>
		<link>https://ExquisiteLines.com/ExquisiteLines/a-pseudo-hdr-image/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clamroll]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 07:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exquisitelines.com/?p=299#comment-4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You should really check out Lucis. It doesnt have half the control that photomatix does, but using some blending and masking in photoshop, you can get brilliant HDR images with less than half the headache of photomatix. It&#039;s much faster too!

Oh and incase you&#039;re worried about the whole multiple images/single RAW thing... don&#039;t be. Most of my best HDRs have been from single raw files. If you expose the file right, you can lift the 2-3 exposures you need with great ease.

http://clamroll.wordpress.com/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should really check out Lucis. It doesnt have half the control that photomatix does, but using some blending and masking in photoshop, you can get brilliant HDR images with less than half the headache of photomatix. It&#8217;s much faster too!</p>
<p>Oh and incase you&#8217;re worried about the whole multiple images/single RAW thing&#8230; don&#8217;t be. Most of my best HDRs have been from single raw files. If you expose the file right, you can lift the 2-3 exposures you need with great ease.</p>
<p><a href="http://clamroll.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://clamroll.wordpress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
